There is a high level of awareness around the importance of strong corporate governance through many aspects of our society.
Share
Coronica Part 2
Whilst the SMSF industry is aware of its significance, governance at the SMSF level is a concept that is not often talked about.
With the word 'governance' being used 14 times in the decision of Coronica and Commissioner of Taxation (Taxation) [2021] AATA 745 (1 April 2021), I turned to thinking about what good governance means for SMSFs and the lessons which can be learnt from this case.
There were many governance issues highlighted by the tribunal throughout the case including:
o Did his own reading on SMSF matters and never appeared to seek a second opinion.
o Ignored the requirements of the trust deed.
o Used systems of accounting which did not have the necessary controls.
o Drafted legal documents, with the Tribunal noting "the Fund’s governance arrangements are now further complicated with Mr Coronica assuming the role of unqualified drafter of legal documents."
In essence, with the way he operated his Fund, there was a lot that could go wrong and a lot did go wrong.
An independent, robust audit is a mechanism that can address some of the governance failures such as those above. Interestingly, part of Mr Coronica' s defence was that unqualified audit opinions had been issued so he thought all was in order. However, the Tribunal effectively dismissed the work of the Fund's auditor as the following comments show:
"The unqualified Part A and Part B statements in the Audit report are not accepted as being appropriately made and the Tribunal rejects the submission that reliance should be placed upon them."
"While the auditor was not called as a witness to explain her audit there is little to suggest she examined the workpapers at an appropriate level."
So what went wrong with the audit in this instance? It's probably no surprise there were long-standing auditor independence issues, as from 1975 to 2008 Mr Coronica was the Fund's auditor, and then from 2009 he was replaced by his 25-year-old daughter.
It's cases like this that highlight the importance of an SMSF auditor's independence and it's no wonder the ATO considers auditor independence to be a vital part of an SMSF's governance.
Considering the governance failings and the resulting compliance breaches, it was very interesting that the Tribunal set aside the decision of the ATO to disqualify Mr Coronica in Coronica and Commissioner of Taxation (Taxation) [2021] AATA 1225 (11 May 2021). However, a key reasoning for their decision to allow Mr Coronica to continue as a trustee was "the Tribunal is of the opinion that with appropriate enforceable undertakings which include a commitment to adopting appropriate governance arrangements, Mr Coronica is highly likely to comply going forward." The governance arrangements the Tribunal enforced included the following:
Most advisers will consider the points above to be non-negotiable components of the governance structure of their clients' SMSFs. The fact the Tribunal thought it was necessary to have them included in the enforceable undertaking speaks volumes for Mr Coronica’s track record when it came to governance matters.
After considering the Coronica case and my own observations from two decades in the industry, my five tips for SMSF trustees are:
Managing Director